Russians
Russians
In Brief
In June 1904 Russian and Japanese armed forces had been at war for several months. Militarism was fed by imperial territorial ambitions on both sides, and both nations had a hand in initiating the hostilities, but many colonized people around the world sympathized with the Japanese because Russia had long been an aggressive and brutally autocratic imperial power. Ulysses suggests that many Irish nationalists took heart from Japan's decisive military victories over the Russians, hoping that the British imperium might soon be similarly humiliated.
Read More
Tsarist Russia had been an expansionist power since the 16th
century and by the 19th century its empire was immense, ruling
well over 100 million people and reaching from Finland to
Crimea, Poland to Alaska, central Asia to the Arctic. Seeking
an ice-free port on the Pacific Ocean, the Russians expanded
into Manchuria and thereby encountered the rising Asian power
of Japan, which was expanding its own sphere of influence into
Korea and Manchuria. Diplomatic efforts to divide the
contested territories failed, and Japan attacked Russia's
Eastern Fleet in February 1904. For the rest of that year an
arrogant Nicholas II declined overtures for an armistice and
arbitration, but his forces suffered defeat after defeat, and
in September 1905 he was forced to agree to a treaty mediated
by American president Theodore Roosevelt. Russia's
international influence dimmed, and a 1905 revolution at home
compelled the tsar to share power with a parliament—a first
step toward the disastrous revolution of 1917.
Although Britain had entered into a military alliance with
Japan in 1902 and must have taken some satisfaction in the
humiliation of its imperial rival, Irish nationalists too may
well have rejoiced, for different reasons. Nationalists in
other colonized regions—India, Indonesia, Indochina, the
Philippines, Poland—were inspired by the defeat of one of the
great European empires. Joyce appears to have been of the same
mind. Looking back from a time after Japan had secured
victory, he made people in 1904 Dublin relish the coming
Russian setback. In Calypso Leopold Bloom, himself
remembering a time before the start of the war, recalls Larry
O'Rourke saying, "Do you know what? The Russians, they'd
only be an eight o'clock breakfast for the Japanese." In
Cyclops Joe Hynes and the Citizen trade observations
about how "the markets are on a rise" because of "Foreign
wars." Says Joe, "It's the Russians wish to tyrannise."
Oxen of the Sun shows that other Dubliners have been
closely following the events in the Pacific: "Jappies? High
angle fire, inyah! Sunk by war specials. Be worse for him,
says he, nor any Roosian." At the beginning of the war,
in February 1904, some Russian battleships and cruisers had
been taken out of action by Japanese artillery shells that
descended at a "High angle" and penetrated the ships' lightly
armored decks. Gifford notes that these losses impelled the
Russian fleet to withdraw from fighting for several months
while repairs were made, and that "The Evening Telegraph,
16 June 1904, reported 'a renewal of activity on the part of
Russia's naval commanders' (though that renewal was to lead to
further Russian losses during the summer of 1904)." Joyce's
characters have been following news of the war, and their
slang suggests partisan identification with the enemy of a
bullying empire: "Inyah" or inagh, from the
Irish an ea, is a sarcastic Hiberno-English
expression meaning "Is that so?"
The Russians' troubles are linked with those of the English
in Eumaeus, when the proprietor of the cabman's
shelter predicts the collapse of the British empire: "But a
day of reckoning, he stated crescendo with no
uncertain voice—thoroughly monopolising all the
conversation—was in store for mighty England, despite her
power of pelf on account of her crimes. There would be a fall
and the greatest fall in history. The Germans and the Japs
were going to have their little lookin, he affirmed. The
Boers were the beginning of the end. Brummagem England was
toppling already and her downfall would be Ireland, her
Achilles heel." Irish public opinion had favored the Boers in
their valiant effort to resist British imperial expansion into
their lands, but they did not finally have sufficient
resources to defeat a great empire. In the shelter-keeper's
view, however, the growing naval power of Germany and Japan
poses a real threat to Britain's supremacy at sea, and Ireland
cannot be counted on to keep playing its role as the backbone
of the British army—a prediction that anticipates debates in
Ireland during World War I.
Circe maintains the link between Russia and England as
Stephen ponders a British soldier's proposal to "bash in your
jaw." He mockingly contrasts Darwinian realism with the bogus
idealism of a tsar and a king who present themselves as
"philirenists," a Hellenic coinage meaning "peace-lovers": "Struggle
for life is the law of existence but human philirenists,
notably the tsar and the king of England, have invented
arbitration. (He taps his brow.) But in here it
is I must kill the priest and the king." In Cyclops
the Citizen has contemptuously dismissed King Edward VII's wish to be
thought of as a "peacemaker" ("Tell that to a fool... There's
a bloody sight more pox than pax about that boyo"), and in
part 5 of A Portrait Stephen disdained the tsar's
proposals for international disarmament and arbitration ("MacCann began to speak with
fluent energy of the Csar's rescript, of Stead, of general
disarmament, arbitration in cases of international
disputes....").
Gifford notes that the tsar's "'peace rescript of 1898'
solicited petitions from 'the peaceloving peoples of the
world'"—people like McCann. The multi-national Hague
Conference of 1899 that followed from these efforts did not
achieve general or even limited disarmament, but it instituted
a body for "arbitration of international disputes and it began
to systematize international laws of war. It is something of
an irony that Nicholas II's peace crusade was a prelude to the
Russo-Japanese War of 1904-5. In retrospect the czar's
motivation appears to have been to stall for time so that
Russia could achieve an armament comparable to that of the
Austro-Hungarian Empire." Gifford's sense of "irony" applies
also to the English king: in 1908 and 1909 Edward twice met
with Nicholas to discuss peace, but their talks "seemed to
presage an alliance with Russia in aid of England's
intensifying naval and colonial competition with Germany." For
the imperial powers jostling for advantage in the years prior
to the Great War, idealism inevitably took a back seat to realpolitik.
Moral clarity was somewhat easier to come by for subjugated
peoples looking in from the outside.